Lockdown vs Invacuation – What do schools need to know
Schools must be ready for both lockdown and invacuation, but the two procedures are not the same. This guide explains the difference and shows how CTprepare helps schools plan, drill and evidence the right response.
Schools are expected to plan for both lockdown and invacuation. While the two procedures share similarities, they apply to different situations and involve different staff actions. Understanding the distinction is essential for effective emergency preparedness — and it is an area where confusion still exists.
Clarifying the confusion
It’s not unusual to see the terms lockdown and invacuation used interchangeably. Some schools and commentators even describe an “invacuation lockdown” as if it were a single procedure.
This blurring of language creates real risks: if staff don’t know the difference, the wrong response may be triggered.
The Department for Education and the National Protective Security Authority are clear: these are separate responses for separate threats.
Invacuation - securing the perimeter and moving everyone safely inside when the threat is outside the school.
Evacuation - securing classrooms and hiding pupils and staff when the threat is inside the perimeter.
CTprepare helps schools keep that distinction clear in their planning, documentation and staff training.
Invacuation
Used when: The threat is outside the school.
Possible triggers:
Armed police activity nearby
Suspicious individual, vehicle or package outside the perimeter
Environmental hazards such as smoke, gas or debris
Dangerous animals in or near school grounds
Severe weather
Staff actions:
Secure the perimeter — gates, doors and access points
Bring pupils and staff inside from outdoor areas
Restrict unnecessary movement between buildings
Take registers once groups are safe
Maintain communication with the incident lead until the all-clear
Benefit: Invacuation creates a hardened boundary while allowing learning and activity to continue indoors where safe.
Lockdown
Used when: The threat is inside the perimeter.
Possible triggers:
Intruder or violent individual on site
Weapon sighting in the grounds or buildings
Suspicious package inside where evacuation is unsafe
Staff actions:
Secure rooms: lock and barricade doors, close blinds, cover vision panels, switch off lights
Move pupils to safe spaces out of sight of doors and windows
Maintain silence until a verified all-clear is given by the incident lead or emergency services
Do not open doors unless the all-clear announcement is given through agreed channels
Benefit: Lockdown provides immediate protection from an on-site threat, limiting visibility and access for intruders.
Why schools need both?
Invacuation and lockdown are complementary but distinct. Invacuation protects against external threats, lockdown against internal ones. Both require:
Clear, distinct alerts or announcements so they are not confused
Staff trained in specific actions for each scenario
Plans documented and rehearsed in line with DfE guidance (2025)
Governors and parents will expect to see evidence that both procedures are properly planned, practised and recorded.
How CTprepare helps?
Security compliance is complex and governors, staff and parents will expect evidence.
CTprepare guides schools step by step through tailored questionnaires and embedded training to create customised compliance documents. It also:
Produces emergency procedures from inituitive, simple to answer online questionnaires.
Asks the right questions to help create practical security plans.
Records drills and training evidence.
Provides governors & inspectors with audit-ready logs.
With CTprepare, schools can be confident that their emergency planning meets both the letter and spirit of Martyn’s Law, while reassuring staff, governors and parents that the school is prepared - not in 2027, but now.
CTprepare guides schools and colleges though intuitive online questionnaires and guided assistance to create emergency plans, supporting Martyn’s Law compliance and keeping children safe in schools.